首页> 外文OA文献 >Examination of the 'all hazards' approach to disaster management as applied to field disaster management and pre-hospital care in Australia
【2h】

Examination of the 'all hazards' approach to disaster management as applied to field disaster management and pre-hospital care in Australia

机译:检验适用于澳大利亚的现场灾害管理和院前护理的“所有灾害”方法进行灾害管理

摘要

Disasters, emergencies, incidents, and major incidents - they all come back to the same thing regardless of what they are called. The common denominator is that there is loss of life, injury to people and animals and damage and destruction of property. The management of such events relies on four phases: 1. Prevention 2. Preparation 3. Response 4. Recovery Each of these phases is managed in a different way and often by different teams. Here, concentration has been given to phases 2 and 3, with particular emphasis on phase 3, Response. The words used to describe such events are often related to legislation. The terminology is detailed later. However, whatever the description, whenever prevention is not possible, or fails, then the need is to respond. Response is always better when the responders are prepared. Training is a major part of response preparation and this book is designed to assist those in the health industry who need to be ready when something happens. One of the training packages for responders is the Major Incident Medical Management and Support (MIMMS) Course and this work was designed to supplement the manual prepared by Hodgetts and Macway-Jones(87) in the UK. Included is what the health services responder, who may be sent to an event in which the main concern is trauma, should know. Concentration is on the initial response and does not deal in any detail with hospital reaction, the public health aspects, or the mental health support that provides psychological help to victims and responders, and which are also essential parts of disaster management. People, in times of disaster, have always been quick to offer assistance. It is now well recognised however, that the \u27enthusiastic amateur\u27, whilst being a well meaning volunteer, isn\u27t always what is needed. All too often such people have made things worse and have sometimes ended up as victims themselves. There is a place now for volunteers and there probably always will be. The big difference is that these people must be well informed, well trained and well practiced if they are to be effective. Fortunately such people and organisations do exist. Without the work of the St John Ambulance, the State Emergency Service, the Rural Fire Service the Red Cross and the Volunteer Rescue Association, to mention only a few, our response to disasters would be far less effective. There is a strong history of individuals being available to help the community in times of crisis. Mostly these people were volunteers but there has also always been the need for a core of professional support. In the recent past, professional support mechanisms have been developed from lessons learned, particularly to situations that need a rapid and well organised response. As lessons are learned from an analysis of events, philosophy and methods have changed. Our present system is not perfect and perhaps never will be. The need for an \u27all-hazards approach\u27 makes detailed planning very difficult and so there will probably always be criticisms about the way an event was handled. Hindsight is a wonderful thing, provided we learn from it. That means that this text is certainly not the \u27last word\u27 and revisions as we learn from experience will be inevitable. Because the author works primarily in New South Wales, many of the explanations and examples are specific to that state. In Australia disaster response is a State, rather than a Commonwealth, responsibility and consequently, and inevitably, there are differences in management between the states and territories within Australia. With the influence of Emergency Management Australia, these differences are being reduced. This means that across state and territory boundaries, assistance is common and interstate teams can be deployed and assimilated into the response rapidly, safely, effectively and with minimum explanation. This text sets out to increase the understanding of what is required, what is in place and how the processes of response are managed. By way of introduction and background, examples are given of those situations that have occurred, or could happen. Man Made Disasters has been divided into two distinct sections. Those which are related to structures or transport and those related directly to people. The first section, Chapter 3, includes: • Transport accidents involving land, rail, sea or air vehicles. • Collapse of buildings for reasons other than earthquakes or storms. • Industrial accidents, including the release of hazardous substances and nuclear events. A second section dealing with the consequences of the direct actions of people is separated as Chapter 4, entitled \u27People Disasters\u27. Included are: • Crowd incidents involving sports and entertainment venues. • Terrorism From Chapter 4 on, the emphasis is on the Response phase and deals with organisation and response techniques in detail. Finally there is a section on terminology and abbreviations. An appendix details a typical disaster pack content. War, the greatest of all man made disasters is not considered in this text.
机译:灾难,紧急情况,事件和重大事件-无论它们叫​​什么,它们都回到同一件事上。共同点是存在生命损失,人员和动物受伤以及财产损失和破坏。此类事件的管理取决于四个阶段:1.预防2.准备3.响应4.恢复这些阶段中的每个阶段都以不同的方式管理,并且通常由不同的团队管理。在这里,已经将注意力集中在阶段2和3,尤其是阶段3,响应。用于描述此类事件的词语通常与立法相关。稍后将详细说明该术语。但是,无论描述如何,只要无法进行预防或失败,那么都需要做出回应。准备好响应者后,响应总是更好。培训是准备响应的主要部分,这本书旨在为医疗行业中需要做好准备的人提供帮助。针对响应者的培训包之一是重大事件医疗管理和支持(MIMMS)课程,该工作旨在补充英国Hodgetts和Macway-Jones(87)编写的手册。其中应包括可能会派遣到主要关注创伤的事件中的卫生服务响应者。注意力集中在最初的反应上,而没有详细讨论医院的反应,公共卫生方面或为受害者和响应者提供心理帮助的心理健康支持,这些也是灾难管理的重要组成部分。在发生灾难时,人们总是迅速提供援助。但是,现在人们已经认识到,热情的业余爱好者虽然是一个善意的志愿者,但并不总是需要的。这些人常常使情况变得更糟,有时甚至成为受害者自己。现在有一个供志愿者使用的地方,也许永远都会有。最大的不同是,要使这些人有效,就必须对他们进行充分的了解,培训和良好的实践。幸运的是,确实存在这样的人和组织。如果没有圣约翰救护车,国家紧急事务部门,农村消防部门,红十字会和志愿人员救援协会的工作,仅举几例,我们对灾难的反应将远没有那么有效。在危机时期,有个人可以帮助社区的悠久历史。这些人大多是志愿者,但始终也需要核心的专业支持。在最近的过去,已经从汲取的教训中发展了专业的支持机制,特别是针对需要快速而有条理的应对的情况。通过从事件分析中学到的经验教训,哲学和方法已经改变。我们目前的系统并不完善,也许永远不会如此。对“全险种”方法的需求使得详细的计划变得非常困难,因此对于事件的处理方式可能始终会存在批评。只要我们从中汲取教训,后见之明就是一件很棒的事情。这意味着该文本肯定不是最后的单词,而我们从经验中学到的修订将是不可避免的。由于作者主要在新南威尔士州工作,因此许多说明和示例都是针对该州的。在澳大利亚,灾害应对是国家而不是英联邦的责任,因此,不可避免地,澳大利亚各州和领地之间的管理存在差异。随着澳大利亚紧急事务管理的影响,这些差异正在减少。这意味着跨州和领地边界的援助是很普遍的,州际团队可以迅速,安全,有效地进行部署,并以最少的解释被吸收到应对中。本文着眼于增进对所需内容,所需内容以及如何管理响应过程的理解。通过介绍和背景,举例说明了已经发生或可能发生的情况。人为灾难已分为两个不同的部分。与建筑物或运输有关的那些以及与人直接有关的那些。第一部分的第3章包括:•涉及陆地,铁路,海上或空中车辆的运输事故。 •建筑物倒塌的原因不是地震或暴风雨。 •工业事故,包括释放有害物质和核事件。关于人的直接行动的后果的第二部分与第4章分开,标题为《人的灾难》。包括:•涉及体育和娱乐场所的人群事件。 •从第四章开始的恐怖主义,重点是响应阶段,并详细讨论组织和响应技术。最后是关于术语和缩写的部分。附录详细介绍了典型的灾难包内容。本文中未考虑战争,这是最严重的人为灾难。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cato, Denys.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2002
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号